Home Ice Hockey (NHL)Toronto Maple Leafs’ Cynics Don’t Have to Work Hard After Loss to the Golden Knights – The Hockey Writers – Toronto Maple Leafs

Toronto Maple Leafs’ Cynics Don’t Have to Work Hard After Loss to the Golden Knights – The Hockey Writers – Toronto Maple Leafs

by Marcelo Moreira

The Toronto Maple Leafs didn’t just lose 6-3 to the Vegas Golden Knights on home ice; they confirmed a pattern that’s been gnawing at this season for weeks now. Three straight losses, now five in the last six games overall. Six goals against in four of the last six games. This isn’t a bad night anymore. It’s a habit. Bad habits, as any old professor will tell you, are harder to break than systems or line combinations.

Related: 3 Takeaways from the Maple Leafs’ 6-3 Loss to the Golden Knights

Head coach Craig Berube didn’t dress it up afterward. He talked about pace, battles, and urgency. He admitted that standards are slipping when they shouldn’t—especially at home. Toronto trailed for 59 minutes, made one respectable push in the second period, and then let the game drift away again when it actually mattered.

The playoff spot the team is chasing? It didn’t vanish Wednesday night, but it got noticeably farther away. Not many more games like this will push it into the gone-baby-gone category.

Item One: The Standard Has Slipped, as Berube Calls It

Berube’s postgame comments were blunt because they had to be. Vegas carried the play early. Won the races. Won the battles. Toronto didn’t. That first period put the Maple Leafs behind the eight ball. While the second-period push was real—about 10 or 11 minutes of it—it made fans say to themselves, “If the Golden Knights did it in Vegas, the Maple Leafs can do it here.” The truth is that the Golden Knights are a better team than the Maple Leafs.

What bothered Berube most wasn’t the slow start to the game. It was the failure to carry momentum into the third period of a one-goal game. Five shots on goal on home ice. Against a team that had played the night before. That’s a push problem for a team that could have come back, but didn’t.

I’m thinking one of the more surprised people in the arena was television analyst Craig Simpson. From how he called the game, you had to know he thought the Maple Leafs were going to roar back for the win in the third. I wonder what his assessment is this morning.

Related: Maple Leafs Reportedly Among Teams Interested in Flames’ Nazem Kadri

When Berube says the standard has to be “better and higher,” he’s not talking about tactics. He’s talking about details, urgency, and simplicity. Right now, the Maple Leafs seem to be doing too many things halfway, which in this league usually means doing them wrong.

Item Two: Goaltending Choices and the Cost of Timing

Anthony Stolarz’s return was curious. After more than 70 days out with a nerve-related upper-body injury, there was no conditioning stint; it was straight into an NHL start. He stopped 25 shots and, to be fair, wasn’t the reason the Maple Leafs lost. Berube said he probably wants the third goal back, but otherwise looked fine and settled in as the game went along.

Anthony Stolarz, Toronto Maple Leafs (Dan Hamilton-Imagn Images)

That may all be true. But the choice matters, for reasons I don’t fully see right now. This wasn’t a must-win on paper, yet the playoff math says every point now carries extra weight. Throwing a goalie into that environment cold—especially behind a team struggling with pace and details—feels less like confidence and more like crossed fingers.

Related: Bobby McMann’s Gesture Says Everything About Maple Leafs Hockey

The larger issue is that goaltending decisions are starting to feel reactive rather than deliberate, a tendency that often arises when a team knows time is slipping away.

Item Three: Roster Health, Ice Time, and Uneasy Signals

There’s no real update on William Nylander beyond hope. He might skate this weekend. Dakota Joshua isn’t even close yet. While injuries explain some things, they don’t explain all of them—especially usage.

Low ice time for Calle Järnkrok (8:48) is interesting. Scott Laughton and Steven Lorentz weren’t far behind. Neither logged 10 minutes of ice time. Meanwhile, Auston Matthews led all forwards at 23:30, which says something about where trust currently lives on this bench.

The underlying numbers from the Vegas game don’t scream catastrophe—Toronto won the faceoff battle and matched special teams. That said, the giveaways, lack of shot volume, and inability to sustain pressure tell a more familiar story. This team can still look dangerous in short bursts. It just can’t live there consistently.

What’s Next for the Maple Leafs?

The schedule won’t wait. Six games in ten days remain before the Olympic break, and only the Calgary Flames and Vancouver Canucks have losing records among the teams chasing. The playoff window is closing quickly, and the margin for “almost” games is gone.

Berube says tweaks aren’t the answer. At this point, execution is the only currency that matters. The Maple Leafs know what works. They’ve shown it in flashes. The problem is that flashes don’t carry teams into April.

Related: Maple Leafs’ Scott Laughton: Veteran Presence Done Right

Standards don’t rise on a whiteboard. They rise when players decide that the third period matters more than comfort, and that home ice actually means something. The next ten days will tell us whether this team still believes that. If they don’t, the cynics will feast as this season slides from pursuit into post-mortem.

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE TO OUR TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS SUBSTACK NEWSLETTER

Source link

Related Posts

Leave a Comment